Pengembangan Model Manajemen Pendidikan Berbasis Teknologi Informasi untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan
Authors
-
Nursaman
STAI Salahuddin Pasuruan
-
Ahmad Aris Fajarudin
STAI Salahuddin Pasuruan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55757/tarbawi.v13i2.1044Keywords:
Kualitas pendidikan, Manajemen pendidikan, Teknologi informasi, Transformasi digitalAbstract
Abstract Purpose: This research aims to develop an information technology-based educational management model to improve education quality in the digital era. Digital transformation in education demands a paradigm shift in management that integrates information technology across all aspects of educational institution governance.
Design/methodology/approach: This study employs a qualitative approach with case study methods in several educational institutions that have implemented IT-based management systems. Data collection was conducted through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis.
Research limitations/implications: This research provides theoretical contributions in developing modern educational management concepts and practical implications for educational institutions in designing sustainable digital transformation strategies.
Findings: The results show that an effective IT-based educational management model includes five main components: technology infrastructure, integrated management information systems, digital competency development, IT policies and governance, and continuous evaluation. Implementation of this model has proven to increase administrative efficiency, learning effectiveness, information accessibility, and data-driven decision making.
Originality/value: This study fills the gap by providing an integrative framework that explains how information technology can enhance management quality and ultimately education quality through a holistic approach considering technical, organizational, and human aspects simultaneously.
References
Al-Busaidi, K. A. (2013). An empirical investigation linking learners' adoption of blending learning to their intention of full e-learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 11(3), 253-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12012
Al-Busaidi, K. A., & Al-Shihi, H. (2012). Key factors to instructors' satisfaction of learning management systems in blended learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24(1), 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9051-x
Asif, M., & Searcy, C. (2014). Towards a standardised management system for corporate sustainable development. The TQM Journal, 26(5), 411-430. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-10-2013-0113
Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Vancouver: Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Christensen, C. M., & Horn, M. B. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. McGraw-Hill.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Daniel, J. (2015). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2015(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.ai
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.23596
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Halverson, R., Grigg, J., Prichett, R., & Thomas, C. (2014). The new instructional leadership: Creating data-driven instructional systems in school. Journal of School Leadership, 17(2), 159-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460701700202
Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
Kumar, J. A., & Bervell, B. (2019). Google Classroom for mobile learning in higher education: Modelling the initial perceptions of students. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1793-1817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-09858-z
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Schleicher, A. (2012). Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century: Lessons from around the world. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264174559-en
Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant observation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., & Tarhini, T. (2017). Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users' acceptance of E-learning in developing countries: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 306-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1122635
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Understanding the relationship between teachers' pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(3), 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9238-5
Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2016). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Wijaya, T. T., Ying, Z., & Purnama, A. (2018). The empirical analysis of problem-based learning model toward students' mathematical problem solving ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), 012157. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012157
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nursaman, Ahmad Aris Fajarudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
