Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika ditinjau dari Tingkat Motivasi

Authors

  • Country of Kiara Cindy Aulia Kiara Cindy Aulia Universitas Dr Soetomo
  • Country of Ardianik Ardianik
  • Country of Windi  Setiawan Windi Setiawan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55757/cejou.v3i2.160

Keywords:

Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model, Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) Cooperative Learning Model, Group Investigation (GI) Cooperative Learning Model, Learning Motivation

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in various cooperative learning models such as the Jigsaw type, the STAD type, and the GI type. This research is a quasi-experimental research. The sample consisted of three classes, namely class 7A subjected to treatment I, class 7B was subjected to treatment II, and class 7C to treatment III, sampling was carried out using cluster sampling technique. Data collection techniques using the method of tests and questionnaires. The data analysis technique used Kruskal Wallis non-parametric statistics. The results of data analysis resulted in 5 different hypotheses. The first hypothesis is the value of Asym Sig. 0.000 < 0.05, the second hypothesis obtained the value of Asym Sig. 0.000 < 0.05, the third hypothesis obtained the Asym Sig value. 0.280 is greater than 0.05, the fourth hypothesis is obtained by the Asym Sig value. 0.000 is smaller than 0.05 and the last hypothesis is the Asym Sig value. 0.006 < 0.05.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afandi, M., Chamalah, E., & Wardani, O. P. (2013). Model Dan Metode Pembelajaran Di Sekolah. In Perpustakaan Nasional Katalog Dalam Terbitan (Kdt)(Vol. 392, Issue 2).

Akbar, P., Hamid, A., Bernard, M., & Sugandi, A. I. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan PemecahanMasalah Dan Disposisi Matematik Siswa Kelas Xi Sma Putra Juang Dalam Materi Peluang. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 144–153. Https://Doi.Org/10.31004/Cendekia.V2i1.62

Andira, A., Hasmawati, H., & R, M. (2020). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad (Student Team Achievement Division) Dalam Keterampilan Menulis Kalimat Sederhana Bahasa Jerman. Interference: Journal Of Language, Literature, And Linguistics, 1(2), 128. Https://Doi.Org/10.26858/Interference.V1i2.14699

Asmuni, A. (2020). Problematika Pembelajaran Daring Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Dan Solusi Pemecahannya. Jurnal Paedagogy, 7(4), 281. Https://Doi.Org/10.33394/Jp.V7i4.2941

Ayu, D., Mahayuni, M., Suharsono, N., Warpala, I. W. S., Studi, P., Pembelajaran, T., & Pascasarjana, P. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Dan Hasil Belajar Ipa Kelas Vii Siswa Smp Negeri 3 Sidemen. 7.

Basa, Z. A., & Hudaidah, H. (2021). Perkembangan Pembelajaran Daring Terhadap Minat Belajar Matematika Siswa Smp Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(3), 943–950. Https://Doi.Org/10.31004/Edukatif.V3i3.461

Batudaa, S. M. K. N. (2017). No Title. 220–225.

Cahyani, A., Listiana, I. D., & Larasati, S. P. D. (2020). Motivasi Belajar Siswa Sma Pada Pembelajaran Daring Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Iq (Ilmu Al-Qur’an): Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(01), 123–140. Https://Doi.Org/10.37542/Iq.V3i01.57

Dr. Ahmad Susanto, M. P. (2016). Teori Belajar Dan Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar. Kencana. Https://Books.Google.Co.Id/Books?Id=Ievndwaaqbaj

Dr.Rusman, M. Pd. (2013). Model Model Pembelajaran.

Ikhsan, M., & Hajidin, Dan. (2020). Pengaruh Model Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams Achievement Division Dan Tipe Jigsaw Terhadap Prestasi Dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Smp. Jurnal Numeracy, 7(1).

Inapi, M. L. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Terhadap Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Sistem Koloid Sman 4 Bantimurung Maros. Pembelajar: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Keguruan, Dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 12. Https://Doi.Org/10.26858/Pembelajar.V2i1.4135.

Downloads

Published

26-09-2022

How to Cite

Aulia, K. C., Ardianik, & Setiawan, W. . (2022). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika ditinjau dari Tingkat Motivasi. Center of Education Journal (CEJou), 3(2), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.55757/cejou.v3i2.160